musicNEWS:
U2's Bono Backed By Broadcasters in FCC Indecency Crackdown
04-21-04
Keavin
.
Update: U2 frontman Bono has a lot of heavy
weights going to bat for him against the Federal Communications Commissions
(FCC) over his 2003 swearing incident during a live broadcast. A coalition
of broadcasters, artist rights groups and media heavyweights filed a petition
with the FCC on Monday asking the regulators to reconsider a recent profanity
ruling over the Bono incident that many consider the first in the FCCs
efforts to crackdown on indecency since the Janet Jackson breast bearing
at the Super Bowl in January.
The coalition consisting of over 20 signatures
to the petition, warn that the recent crackdown were already threatening
free speech on TV and radio. They also feel that the FCC has overstepped
their constitutional authority. Viacom Inc., Fox Entertainment Group, and
the Screen Actors' Guild were among those that signed the petition that
protests the FCCs finding in March that NBC affiliate television stations
had violated a federal profanity law during a live broadcast of the Golden
Globe awards in 2003, when U2 frontman Bono blurted out the words fucking
brilliant from the stage. The FCC had previous ruled, prior to Nipple-gate,
that it was in inadvertent slip of the tongue and did not violate the law.
The FCC has recently proposed stiffer penalties
for broadcast indecency including higher fines and revoking broadcast licenses
for repeated offenses.
If the FCC dismissed the request of the
petitioners, the next step is to take the issue to court.
Update 4/21: FCC chairman Michael Powell
told a conference of the National Association of Broadcasters on Tuesday
that he does not support a new bill that would revoke a stations license
following a third indecency violation.
"I don't think you should reduce something
as facile and vague as indecency to clear cause-and-effect consequences,"
Michael Powell said. "I don't like the idea that we could trip into license
revocation."
Powell also addressed concerns that the
government may be going overboard in enacting new rules for indecency.
"I think the government should be exceedingly conservative about any regulation
of content for anyone," he said. "I don't generally support the extension
of content rules unless Congress supports a statement asking us to do so".
Powell was careful to point out that it
is the current laws on the books that are being used and warned against
those that wish to have the government step in further to define indecency.
"The indecency provision that is being administered today is the same one
that's been around for decades," Powell said. "You do not want the government
to write a red book of what you can say and not say".
He pointed out the Supreme Court has ruled
on the free speech implications of FCC rules and sanctioned the limiting
of sexual content and offensive language on the public airwaves.
"I would like to see the industry step
up and put the commission on the sidelines," added Commissioner Michael
Copps. "Until that time, the FCC has an obligation to enforce and use all
the tools we have."
tell
a friend about this article
know
of a news item we should cover?
antiMUSIC
News featured on RockNews.info, Google
News and ARTISTdirect
NewsWire
.
Rant
or Rave? Your turn, post you comments
and thoughts on this news item. But hey keep it clean, we wouldn't want
to have to wash your mouth out with Old Spice.
Fan
Speak:
...end |