antiTainment
NEWS: Van Helsing A Campy-Embarrassment?
05-02-04
Keavin
.
Internet tastemakers are slaying “Van Helsing,”
calling it long on cheese and short on plot. They are writing the film
off as a cool premise that is degraded into a popcorn mass-market driven,
over the top waste of time.
One fan wrote about the film on the Rotten
Tomatoes website. He said the film started strong but quickly deteriorated.
He also took the casting director to task over some of the hiring. He dismissed
Richard Roxburgh’s portrayal of Dracula, “every time he tried to be funny
or over the top it came out terribly.” This fan also had plenty of venom
to spew over the casting of the three vampire brides. “Going with models
instead of actors with these parts really killed the feel of the film.”
According to this viewer, the film “went from campy-fun to campy-embarrassing.”
It is not surprising to hear the word “campy”
thrown around. Stephen Sommers, the man that brought us “The Mummy” movies,
directed the film.
The real scathing reviews came from Ain’t
it Cool News. One person writes, “with all the money in the world spent
on this movie, one would think that ANY script might be a good place to
start, this where the whole thing just doesn't come close to working AT
ALL.” This reviewer also had a problem with Roxburgh’s performance as Dracula,
“this guy is SO OVERTHE TOP, it makes you wish for William Shatner to show
up, at least he's fun to watch.”
Another person wrote in to Ain’t It Cool
News about a screening for the film. According to this person, not one
person in the audience enjoyed the movie. The biggest reaction from the
audience came not from what was on screen but from an outburst from a fellow
movie goer, “The point at which the audience cheered the loudest during
the movie was when someone in the back shouted 'THIS MOVIE SUCKS NUTS!’”
He capped off his review with the following:
“The best example I can give of how bad this movie is is this: As we were
walking out of the free screening my girlfriend turned to me and said,
‘I want my money back. I want my life back.’”
Another viewer was apparently at the same
screening and also commented on the outburst from the audience, “Near the
end, when things got even more ludicrous in this cheeseball wrapped in
cotton candy fun house of a movie, some audience member in the packed screening
yelled out ’This movie sucks nuts!’”
Universal discounts the rantings of Internet
“geeks,” according to MSNBC. "Geeks are like the new jocks," says Universal
chairman Stacey Snider. "They're too cool for school. Having their support
is meaningful sometimes, but they want filmmakers to show a little restraint,
to hold back, and Stephen doesn't do that. His movies are designed as popular
entertainment. Everyday fans love them, but it doesn't give him street
cred."
The experts are split on whether this film
will bomb at the box office. Some expect it to be the biggest film of the
summer, while others think it will be a huge embarrassment for Universal,
which sunk a reported 150 million into the flick.
We will soon see the public’s verdict when
the film opens on Friday. Will it draw in more viewers than Brad Pitt’s
new epic “Troy”? Or will early negative buzz slay the film before it goes
head to head with “Shrek 2” the following week?
antiTainment returns! now anti once again goes beyond just music!
tell
a friend about this article
know
of a news item we should cover?
antiMUSIC
News featured on RockNews.info, Google
News and ARTISTdirect
NewsWire
.
Rant
or Rave? Your turn, post you comments
and thoughts on this news item. But hey keep it clean, we wouldn't want
to have to wash your mouth out with Old Spice.
Fan
Speak:
...end |