So we now know this band got bad advise
from a manager to latch on to a popular trend and it did pay off, they
scored two hit singles from their debut album and it looked like things
were starting to really take off for them. But two things were about to
happen to them that they had absolutely no control over and couldn’t see
coming, that would utterly blindside them and they would never recover.
Unbeknownst to the band and their manager
at the time, the head of their label (which was a subsidiary of a larger
label) was vying for the presidency of the parent label. The head of the
parent label didn’t take too kindly to this and since he had all the real
power, he retaliated by trying to undermine the success of the subsidiary.
It’s the age old pissing contest in a corporate board room and unfortunately
as often happens, those who are involved with the power play come out smelling
like a rose at the end but the careers of those under them are destroyed.
This band along with a few other emerging bands on that label got caught
in the crossfire and because of the head of their label’s aspirations these
bands paid the ultimate price with their careers.
This band in particular got hit hard because
after the success of their debut album which enjoyed decent sales for a
first effort, they were trying to make up for the mistake of latching on
to the popular image at the time and really toned down their look and instead
decided to make an album that would quiet all of their critics and those
who labeled them just another band in the cattle heap jumping on the band
wagon at the end of a trend in music. It almost worked.
This band’s sophomore album was light years
ahead of their debut and instantly won them critical praise. Their star
seemed on the rise with radio, the music press and even MTV paying attention
but that buzz ended almost overnight when the band was blindsided by the
battle going on in the corporate boardroom. The head of the parent label
pulled out all the stops and took away all support for the artists on the
subsidiary. So as this band watched their first single start to get airplay
and climb the charts, all of a sudden radio stopped playing the song. Why?
Because the head of the parent label actually instructed the label’s radio
promoters to have radio stations and MTV pull the song from rotation. Even
worst, is the band had an opening spot on one the biggest tours of that
summer and without explanation they were told that the tour was off.
So the band was stuck holding the bag,
they had created the album of their career, were hailed by critics and
were actually making end roads into re-establishing themselves as a band
above the current trend in music, trying to shake off the shackles of that
image with their new album, when the rug was pulled out from under them.
By the time some people at the label leveled with them and told them what
was happening, it was too late.
They knew that their album wasn’t going
to get promoted by the label and was dead in the water. They could have
returned to the studio to record a new album but they knew it too would
be dead on arrival. So their manager advised them to file bankruptcy to
get out of their record deal. Which they did. Luckily, they were
immediately picked up by another big label and given a much smaller deal
that would allow them to carry on and have a chance at salvaging their
career.
But the miscalculation of going with a
certain image trend backfired on them and even through they had tried to
divorce themselves from that scene with their second album, with their
label pulling out all support for that CD, they were unable to break free
of the image of their first album. In the mean time, that trend was replaced
by an entirely new one and when this band’s third album came out a few
things worked against them. One, the image which they had thrown away almost
as fast as they embraced it, still hung over their heads and worse was
the fact that their new label’s approach to promoting them was all wrong.
This label had very little experience with rock bands so to them success
rested firmly on the top 40 charts, unfortunately the kind of music needed
to break the top 40 at that time was a death sentence for a rock band.
The label head convinced the band to include two power ballads on what
was otherwise a strictly hard rockin’ album. Needless to say, when it came
time to promote the album, the label miscalculated and misread the rock
scene at the time and went with the ballads. So that album was doomed from
the start. In the meantime, the band’s manager had went overboard during
the recording of the album and rented lavish hotel suites, was being shuffled
around in a rented Rolls Royce and brought in fancy catering to the studio,
and even had the band go back in to the studio with an expensive producer
after the album was completed to rerecord the two ballads to make them
more “pop.” So at the end of the day, even with the deal they struck
and the amount of albums they did sell, the band should have walked away
with a modest profit, but due to lavish expenses run up by their manager
they were once again in the hole to the record company.
Shortly after that the band left that label
and finally severed ties with their manager, who had lead them so far astray
it’s not even funny. Since then, the band has released a number of albums
on independent labels, all of which were met with critical praise and if
they would have had some muscle behind them in the promotion department,
they could have been huge hits, but sadly so many things went wrong for
this band in the early days and they were compromised to such an extreme
by their management and record labels that they never stood a chance. Even
though the music warrants success, sadly this band will never have an honest
shot at it and that is just another thing about the music industry that
not only deeply saddens me, it pisses me off to no end. What the hell is
wrong with an industry that screws over bands that produce quality music,
while mediocre bands top the charts? Will the roaster eventually
come home to roost? Will these kinds of practices backfire on managers
and labels eventually forcing them to change? Will artists finally start
taking charge of their own careers and sidestep shyster lawyers, corrupt
managers and record labels that are out to screw them? It may have
to get worst before it can get better but looking at the current musical
landscape, I can’t see how it could possible get any worst with even the
record labels losing money by sticking to their old tried and true practices.
Something has to break soon, but also bands need to know going in that
some of the people that are supposed to be looking out for their best interest
are actually only out for themselves.
Act III - It's Really Up to Us
Great music will always be made as long
as there are people who love it and are inspired to make it. But the sad
fact of the matter is there may be a whole wealth of incredible music for
us to chose from but we will never have the chance to hear it, simply because
we don’t know it exists. I don’t know the overall lesson or moral of this
story; it might just be a sad commentary on how the music business works
but then again it’s important for people to know that the problem exist
so they know that it has to be changed. The record industry is currently
fighting a desperate battle against the winds of change and the promise
of the Internet. We are not nearly at the point where the net will make
a fundamental difference for quality bands, but the writing is on the walls.
The bands and the fans know that the old ways don’t work and hopefully
someday we will no longer have stories like this to tell. We will have
a music industry where the bands are able to reach the fans directly and
also make a decent living. But at this point that is just a pipe dream
and the entire foundation of the music industry would have to change for
that to happen.
The first step is recognizing the problem
and now it’s time to look for solutions. One thing you can do as a fan
is to go out and support local and independent music. If you hear of a
great local or indy band, tell everyone you know about them, drag those
friends to the shows, buy the indy CD’s. It has to start at the grassroots
and if every serious music fan made the effort to support just one indy
or local band, the effect could be tremendous. It’s up to us to keep the
real music scene alive. We can’t count on radio, MTV or the record industry
to do that.
Keep this band’s story in mind the next
time you see a listing for a local or indy band playing at a club or theater
near you. Because that is where you will find them playing today and despite
all of the setbacks and roadblocks placed in their way, they have kept
one thing burning in their hearts, it’s about the music. While they have
been robbed of their chance to become hugely successful, they continue
year after year to carry on because in the end what’s important is they
love music and will go through hell and back to keep making it. That’s
why it’s up to us to support them and all struggling bands because they
are doing it for us and because they love the music. At the end of the
day that’s what the music industry should really be about, the music. It’s
up to us to help bring that about. No amount of ranting or complaining
about how terrible the music mainstream is will bring about the changes
needed to give the music industry back to the fans and the honest musicians.
It’s up to us to help that happen, so look around town for where live music
is being performed and take a chance on the unknown bands playing there.
True, the bands may be terrible, but then again you’re future favorite
band could being playing right down the street as you read this. I’m not
naïve enough to think that this will help fundamentally change the
music industry but it’s a good start in that direction and we have to begin
somewhere.
FAN
SPEAK: Agree or Disagree? It's your turn, what do you think?
Fan
Speak:
Posted by vae: In the beginning, before there was vinyl
(recorded music that is) and record companies, everything was performed
live and it was mainly of a local nature, with local talent. In my hometown,
in Charleston, WV there was a time when you could turn on the radio or
TV and hear/see your family; friends and co-workers make music “live”.
I caught the tail end of it as a child. Your readers would be served well
by getting a copy of “Mountain Boys Are Free” and learning something about
the LEA act; the early days of the music industry, the music business and
how the musicians lived and what they sacrificed and lived through. The
business practices of the current music industry model are probably capitalism
at its very worse. On the music end of it, I hear and see beautiful young
girls, blessed with great voices that have no creative or artistic ability
what–so-ever. I hear guy bands that can’t read or write music, play an
instrument, much less sing. The actual bands I hear are little better than
a garage band. Most of these people haven’t paid enough dues to have developed
technically much less creatively. I’m sure this will piss some of the younger
readers off, but there are some outstanding artists in this country who
have and will never amount to anything in the business, because they are
just to authentic and the industry doesn’t like that. The music industry
wants “players”, individuals with no character that they can manipulate.
That’s the bottom line, unfortunately.
Posted by
pick: No, cutting out the middleman would only
make things worse. If anyone's ever studied law, the trickiest part of
deciphering contract law is deciding the specifics of royalties. Greenhorn
musicians would never be able to negotiate royalty contracts unless they
have an extensive law background.
Posted by
Magustyle: I don't know about having musicians Unions
ar anything like that.... But,It sucks that Musicians get exploited....on
the other hand though....in this day and age, it's pretty common knowledge
that the majors will screw you...... If your gonna work your ass off for
the rest of your life to pay back your label....why not cut out the middleman
and start your own....either way your going to be pouring more than you
pocket into it, why not make the extra step and have a more control.....
Look at Fugazi.....and I know how popular Fugazi is.....but Dischord didn't
start out with the clout it has today.. the book "Our Band Could be Your
Life." should be a required primer for folks wanting to start a band.....
Hell the Buzzc*cks were doing the independant label thing back in 1979.....
and as for Napster.....METALLICA has b*lls?.....James used to make cassatte
copies of Lars' New Wave Of British Heavy Metal Albums, because he couldn't
afford to buy them all himself.....I see no difference between that and
Filesharing.....why don't we stop people from playing covers....our why
don't we start copyrighting chords.....
Posted by
pick: aG, you are 100% correct. The entertainment
industry (sports, music, movies and books) is THE only industry in which
the employees (athletes, musicians, actors/directors and writers) are THE
true players. Without musicians there would be no music industry! They
should control the business, and that's why the only thing that'll solve
their woes is a union. I'm not a big organized labor fan but in this instance
they need it.
Posted by
aG: Pick, I know what you are saying but you
know what the music industry doesn't have to be that way.
Posted by
pick: aG, as always, great article. Not the
best grammar but a very good perspective. However, my patience is running
thin with people who cry "wolf" at the music industry. I do feel sorry
for musicians who get treated like garbage, yet they choose to be musicians
and they SHOULD know the game. EZN just as easily could have gotten jobs
as factory workers and worked long hours, get puny pensions and receive
little medical benefits. There are people in America who are much worse
off.
Posted by
dreamyrovers sona: missing u..
Posted by
Keavin: Ms.Q - I couldn't agree more, ten years
ago I would have given you a totally different persective but I can't fault
musicians for wanting to make a living, unless they totally change their
music in order to do so. Nag, there are exceptions and some bands have
come out of relative obscurity and became huge successes .. Fleetwood Mac
comes to mind, they were around for years as basically a great blues rock
band but then got Stevie and Lindsey and it exploded. Soul Asylum was also
around for years before they became really popular. Lith, you make an extremely
valid point, I've had conversations with members of this band about some
decisions they have made even in the recent past like going on tour with
Poison and Chip actually had a great arguement for that. If they play side
by side with some of the bands they were lumped in with , it only helps
to show people just how different they really are from that crowd. Another
thing is the fact that Poison is still extremely popular believe it or
not and that tour even outsold Ozzfest in some markets, so while it seems
like a step backwards, EZN going on tour with them helped them exposure
their true nature and also reach a lot of people they would not have reached
otherwise. It's not a stretch to say that glam fans would like what EZN
does, but on the other hand a lot of EZN aren't into glam and some really
don't care for it like myself. On the Harry thing, I know why you got that
impression, he pushes that angle, which from his standpoint works for him,
it sells tickets since there are a lot of people in LA who are still into
that whole scene but really his shows have very little if anything to do
with the glam scene. Even the band featuring the guy from Kix is just a
really good blues rock band, nothing glam about them and I have yet to
see or hear a glam band play there, but yes some of the bands and the all
star jam feature past glam rockers but that goes back to making a living
thing, they cashed in on that trend to make it, which hurt them in the
long run but most of those guys are into the old school rock like AC/DC,
Sabbath etc and that's where they are coming from now. But I do have to
say I don't consider LA Guns among the Poison and Warrants, go listen to
their first album and it has nothing to do with that scene, it's just street
level rock. Remember Tracii co-founded GNR, so LA Guns has a lot more in
common with GNR than Warrant, although I will grant you that some of their
singles on later albums like the ballads border line on the popmetal thing.
wow I just wrote a book. nuff said, I'm out!
Posted by
Ms.Q: Really the more I learn about the music
industry, the more sympathetic I am towards artists. There was a time when
I was quick to yell sellout until I realized some of our artists are practically
starving. I don't blame any of them for paying the rent via commercials
or any avenue. I do agree with your point Lith,but maybe they have families
to feed.
Posted by
LithiumBliss: If I ever did make it out to the Left
Coast I think I'd hit Seattle way before I'd think of LA, but I'll take
your word for it on the Harry thing. I guess after I read the part about
"jams with members of LA Guns, Warrant, and Kixx (et al)" and saw some
of the pictures, I felt I didn't need to scroll down any further. Maybe
I'll read further someday, but I hate AquaNet music like a son of a bitch.
And Nag, I myself wasn't labeling EZN, I was only questioning some of their
actions when you would think they would want to distance themselves from
the glam tag.
Posted by
Nag: Well you can't label them cause they do
an interview with Metal Sludge, they have had Tom Morello, Poppoff from
Lit, and the drummer chick from HOle do interviews on there recently. Plus
a few porn stars and wrestlers. Plus I highly doubt they will experance
a carrer resurgance after 13 years. When its like that you really can't
blame them or anyone else for trying to get a little publicity, thats what
puts the food on the table right?
Posted by
aG: Any press is good press is that attitude
and Sludge ask him for an interview he gives it. As for Happenin' Harry's
that is a total mischaractorization, Harry features ALL kind of music.
You may be refering to his jamm band that features a lot of old hair rockers
but the bands that play Happenin' Harry's cover the entire spectrum. twelvehourmary,
Lowfive (Nick L from QOSTA's new band) Bird, Wonderlove etc have all played
recent shows there and they are about as different from eachother as they
are from "hair metal". So I understand where you are coming from and the
band going on tour with Poison a few years back wasn't a bright move either
but that's part of the internal politics that is going on right now. But
the Happenin' Harry thing is way off base, I love his shows and I detest
the likes of Poison, Winger etc. So if you ever make it out here, let me
know I'll hook you up on the guest list and you can come see for yourself.
for now go listen to the samples at these sites and tell me they are "hair"
wonderlove.net twelvehourmary.com lowfive.org - BTW Harry's band plays
songs from AC/DC, Maiden, Sabbath, Deep Purple, Alice in Chains etc. If
you want hair rock covers go across the street to the Viper room and see
"metal shop" for poison, warrant etc.
Posted by
LithiumBliss: I've got a serious question for you aG,
and it will probably piss you off, but I mean no disrespect. However, if
EZN has been dogged in the past by being unfairly lumped in with the "glam"
scene, then why is the maybe ex lead singer giving interviews to Metal
Sludge and playing a solo gig soon at Happenin' Harry's Hair Farm? It seems
to me that these are the last things the guy would want to be doing. Yeah,
I know you'll probably fry this post as soon as you see it, but I gave
these guys a listen, and though they're not exactly my cup of whiskey they
did have some good tunes and should have had at least some measure of commercial
success, rather than the likes of Sting or Rod Stewart.
Posted by
Mr. huh? saying, "My Generation Sucks!": Actually, I somewhat agree. I don't think
that file-trading should be made illegal, so long as the artist ultimately
has the say-so. It's understandable if one declines however.
Posted by
The Advocate Devil: I think struggling musicians can add the
fans to the list of people ripping them off. Everyone just loves file sharing
these days and "sticking it to the record companies." But anyone who thinks
that pirating music is somehow helpful to the musicians or will result
in better music is really selling a truckload of crap, and things will
only get worse for young bands in the future (sans some revolution in music
distribution). I'm probably the only person alive who thinks Metallica
had big balls for standing up on principle and saying it's not the consumers
right to determine how someone else's music is distributed. Totally off-topic
suggestion for this site: make the box for typing responses bigger. It
is really tiny.
Posted by
GREENMUSE: i can only remember actully hearing the
song on mtv years ago(whew showing my age here,mtv? videos?rock videos?dinosaurs
walking the earth)and the video was diddly darn silly i didnt pay much
attention to the song,yesterday i saw the end of the video on vh1 classic,and
by end i mean the song was completly over so i still didnt get to hear
it.i think the video really hurt them being taken seriously as artists,rainbows
and rainbow colored glasses,are never cool,no matter who you are,well boy
george might have been able to pull it off,but doubtful.one day ill get
around to getting a cd of thiers.
Posted by
Keavin: You know without this band there wouldn't
be an antiMUSIC or Rocknworld. The whole idea in the beginning was to create
a site to promote underrated bands like this one and a couple mentioned
here like Ike Reilly and Vast. But it was Enuff Z'nuff I had in mind when
I first got the idea for Rocknworld almost five years ago. This article
didn't tell half of the story, the interview aG mention was over an hour
long and Donnie really went into what happened to them and it is heartbreaking.
I first heard about these guys from a radio interview with Paul Stanley
back in 89 and Paul was asked what new bands he liked and he raved about
Enuff Z'nuff. Then a week or so later I heard "Fly High Michelle" on the
radio and loved it, it had sort of a Beatle vibe but not a total ripoff,
just a seasoning of the fab four. I bought the CD before I saw the videos
and to be honest, if I would have seen the image I wouldn't have paid any
attention to the music. I like that first CD but it was the second one
Strength that hooked me. Talk about a remarkable CD! And that title track
is amazing. Well you just read what happened with that. These guys have
put out an incredible catalog of music over the past 10 years or so and
it's a shame more people don't know about them. What I really like about
them is they have great songs but also cover a lot of bases musically from
hard rock to Beatlesq tunes, powerpop, folk, blues, to grunge even stuff
that borders on punk-pop (back in 1985 before anyone heard of it) . Each
album has a different personality. For those who don't know them and want
to check them out, go to this page (a site I also run) http://www.peachfuzz.org/new/disc/index.html
there you will find real audio for all of the songs from 9 of their 11
albums, plus their videos (I won't get into that) and some mp3's. Like
I said they cover a lot of bases. For the heavier stuff check out Paraphernalia
and Tweaked. Strength has heavy stuff but also some more slower and moody
songs. Seven is the more eclectic stuff, mellower but some amazing songs
on there. 10 is a mixed bag mostly a great rock album with some poppier
stuff. 1985 is pure power-pop, great stuff from when the band first got
together! Peachfuzz is more straight forward guitar pop. The first album
is perhaps their weakest, you can tell the record company had a big hand
in that one but a few of the songs are great, Fly High Michelle although
you wouldn't know it from the mood of the song, it's about a girl who od'd.
New Thing is fun, with some cool guitar. For Now and I could never be without
you are good love songs. I could come up with a list of recommended songs
but it's different for everyone, they are strong songwriters and there
are very few I skip over.
Posted by
TK138: Ewww, Enuff Z'Nuff suck! JUST KIDDING!
The only song of their's I've really heard is "Mother's Eyes", which might've
been the single aG was talking about from the second album that suddenly
got pulled, and I thought it was pretty damn good. That's a pretty heart
breaking story. What's even sadder is that in Metal Sludge's "Famous Last
Words", or whatever it's called, Enuff Z'nuff got dissed by one of their
heroes in Cheap Trick, probably just because of their past image. But Cheap
Trick might as well have been a hair band from the mid-'80s through the
mid-'90s.
Posted by
Ms.Q: I actually remember the MTV videos. And
honestly, I was turned off by them because of that video. Then a few years
later, (quite by accident)I heard Strength and found out I actually liked
them. Great article, AG.
Posted by
Mr. huh? saying, "My Generation Sucks!": Sadly, I have yet to hear any of their
music. I only learned about them from the constant adulation they receive
on this website. I'll have to go and find a copy of some of their definative
albums since I know that I can trust this website, after all, this website
is what exposed me to the genius Ike Reilly.
Posted by
Mr. huh? saying, "My Generation Sucks!": Enuff Znuff? Makes perfect sense. When
they came out, the where lumped in as just another 80's hair-metal band
(even appearing on VH1's "Where Are They Now: Hair Bands") only to end
up as a critical darling in the underground.
Posted by
GREENMUSE: fantastic article antiguy,if my articles
were half as well researched and well written as yours id be a dnagerous
man.i knew artists got the screw job,but i never knew the specifics of
the process.call me a pessimist,but i dont think it will ever change,unless
perhaps artists quit signing with the majors,i wonder if smaller lables
are just as bad,but seeing how there is less money involved nobody pays
them much mind
Posted by
Top Shelf: Sad story. Fangdango is correct. It's
a mockery of what is real.
Posted by
Kurt Fangdango: It's Enuff Znuff...I watched most of this
happen...from the outside...looking in...I didn't see everything...but...sad
but true...the band has made mistakes too...but, I know the label crap
is true because I dealt with 2 of the morons at Atco and 1 guy from Atlantic
during the band's tenure... Hail EZ...great songs...and darn swell guys
just to hang with... Love em'...
Posted by
Batman: I feel the band in question is talented,
but just not my type of thing. aG's point is a very important one, but
I think that the change is most likely to come if legal changes like Satan's
(Courtney Love) work.
Posted by
aG: Nag, good one.. I knew some would get
it.. I'll put up who it is after a week or so. Mr. Huh, it wasn't a matter
of people judging them harshly, I just didn't want any preconceived notions
that some might have with this band clouding the telling of the story.
It’s amazing how close-minded some people can get and refuse to look at
anything that challenges whatever they have already made up their mind
about. Just look at the debate on politics going on in the Fan Speak on
the rant on congress passing that law for the RIAA. People counter one
person’s arguments entirely with some facts and that person instead of
acknowledging that he/she may have been wrong instead sidesteps the issue
or attacks. I know this is a totally different area than politics where
people get really heated about things but some people just see what they
want to see in order to back up what they have already made up in their
minds. I’m sure you’ve seen it, even here, where some people have a set
idea or opinion about something and nothing is going to get them to change
it.
Posted by
Nag: Yeah thats the only problem now you are
going to have idiots like me trying to guess what band it is. psst... (Starts
with an E and ends with an F)
Posted by
Mr. huh? saying, "My Generation Sucks!": Great article. Honestly though, what is
the band that you're talking about. I'm very curious and I promise I won't
judge harshly.