U2 Win Legal Victory In Copyright Lawsuit

(Radio.com) A U.S. District Court judge has determined that U2 did not violate copyright laws with their song "The Fly" from the 1991 album Achtung Baby. English musician Paul Rose had filed suit against U2, claiming his song "Nae Slappin" inspired a 12-second segment of "The Fly" and sought damages from U2 and Universal Music Group.

The judge dismissed the case, noting that similarities between "The Fly" and "Nae Slappin" were not "qualitatively significant," reports Billboard. In his suit, Rose claimed he sent a demo tape to UMG between 1989 and the release of Achtung Baby. The experimental musician said the guitar line, bass line and percussion U2 used in "The Fly" mimicked his demo, as did the band's chord shifts from E7 to A7. More broadly, he claimed "The Fly" shares a "dimension of sound" with "Nae Slappin."

Judge Denise Cote determined that only six percent of Rose's track shares elements with the U2 song. That "fragment," she wrote, bears little significance to "The Fly" as a whole.

"The fragment appears only once near the beginning of the recording; it is not repeated," she wrote. "It is one of multiple, at times seemingly random, guitar lines and styles strung together over the course of the composition." Read more here.

U2 Music, DVDs, Books and more U2 T-shirts and Posters More U2 News Share this article Related Stories U2 Stream Songs Of Surrender Version Of 'With Or Without You' Bono & The Edge: A Sort of Homecoming, with Dave Letterman Premiering On St. Patrick's Day U2 To Deliver Songs Of Surrender In March U2's Bono Announces Additional Stories Of Surrender Dates Bono Announces More 'Stories of Surrender' Dates