Disclaimer: the opinions
expressed are those of the author, not necessarily those of antiMUSIC,
or the iconoclast entertainment group
antiMUSIC is pleased to welcome industry insider Jake Brown to give
us his perspective on topics involving the music business. Jake comes to
us with an impressive resume that not only includes heading his own record
label, but also as an established music biographer with several books under
his belt.
Is Lenny Kravitz
still a rock star? He seems intent on convincing the world that he
is these days, in case they forgot... and especially considering that his
last 2 albums have NOT sold like a rock star’s! Sales, sales, sales!
I’m going to get the “rock is about more than that dude” crowd, but NOT
WHEN YOU WANT MAINSTREAM ACCEPTANCE! Not unless you’re IGGY POP,
and your iconic status was NEVER based on record sales, typically therein
you defined a genre of some kind. Lenny Kravitz NEVER defined a genre,
he made his name instead on borrowing from every one of rock’s. Now,
let me also state on the outset of this rant that I AM A FAN of Lenny’s,
even up through his 1998 release, “5”. That record was the
beginnning of Lenny’s commercial downfall, because the record was out a
full year before it went platinum, which finally happened based on the
hit ‘Butterfly’, which Virgin Records spent a ton of money promoting at
radio and video. Thereafter, he released a Greatest Hits album that
had a single on it entitled ‘Again’, which achieved moderate radio success
but didn’t propell the hits collection to platinum status. That happened
via an endless barrage of promotion from the label, almost forcing Lenny’s
hits down listeners consumers throats. The album went platinum, a
respectable showing for a hits collection, but not quite up to par with
the icon status Kravitz would like to enjoy at this point in his career.
Part of the success of Lenny Kravitz’s
magic in the old days, when he actually sold records was that it was largely
accidental, he created hit records without any identifiable regard for
radio. They were written from the heart, usually about love the loss
thereof, and usually his biggest hits were broken as 2nd or 3rd singles,
case in point including ‘It Ain’t Over Till Its Over’ written about the
fallout from his relationship with wife Lisa Bonet, and ‘I Can’t Get You
Off My Mind’, about the death of his mother, actress Roxy Roker.
Lenny Kravitz as a musician is emmensely talented, but as a songwriter
he often struggles for imagination (and is critically cited) for his habit
of strongly borrowing from his artistic derivatives. When he let
those derivatives naturally blend into and influence his own sound, Lenny
Kravitz came up with some remarkably original variations and innovations
of the various styles and sounds which compose his influences, examples
being songs like ‘Let Love Rule’ and ‘Stand By My Woman’. Still,
when he attempts to be equally as anthematic based on obvious hits past,
he falls flat on his face, prominent examples being the retarded ‘Rock
N Roll is Dead’ and ‘Don't Go And Put A Bullet In Your Head!’.
Perhaps Lenny’s most relaxed and successful
effort is 1993’s “Are you Gonna Go My Way”, the lead single (and also the
album’s most successful) is largely comprised of a riff that repeats
itself over and over throughout the song over Lenny’s simplistic but infectious
chorus ‘Are You Gonna Go My Way?’ Fans did, to the tune of 3 million
records sold. His follow-up, “Circus”, failed to even go Gold at
the time of its initial life of project, although it eventually did through
catalog sales. Fans just didn’t get Lenny on that one, how could
someone who borrowed so greatly from Rock n’ Roll to secure his own place
in its annals be in a position of any legitimate authority to declare its
demise? Was this because Lenny had run out of influences to rip off?
Perhaps he was attempting to kill off the impression that he was incapable
of orginality in the hopes of laying groundwork for his own legacy with
the irony of the song’s title? Who knows? The point is, in
the end, FANS DID NOT RESPOND, and the only ironic thing about Lenny’s
lead single was that he essentially hammered the nails into his own commercial
coffin. And anybody who knows anything substantial about Lenny Kravitz’s
sound is that was NOT HIS INTENTION! Otherwise, he would not have
attempted something so radically different on 1998’s “5” in an attempt
to jumpstart his stalled career. Then there was the ANNOYING ‘American
Woman’ cover from 1999’s “Austin Powers II: The Spy Who Shagged Me”, which
was arguably the most overplayed song of that year. That Kravitz
had to resort to a cover to keep his rekindled fire going only re-enforces
the fact that he lacked one of rock’s most basic essentials for longevity,
originality. His reliance on derivative rock styles would make this
naturally impossible.
On Lenny Kravitz’s latest album, he is
at his most contrived and sadly commercial, a case in point being the lead
single ‘Where Are We Running?’, where Kravitz is pictured trafficing back
and forth between trashed hotel rooms, slutty models, and crowds packed
well beyond Kravitz’s live draw power in modern day. In the latest
attempt to force him upon us as something artistically relevant, Kravitz
principally fails to do so by trying as commercially as he does to convince
us he belongs there. His previous album, “Lenny”, released in 2001,
suffered miserably at retail, failing to go even platinum. That Kravitz
is attempting to reinvent himself as an icon on this release is equally
as sad, and the sales of his latest effort are the best reflection of the
latter- after debuting at a respectable #14 on the Billboard Album Chart,
the record plunged to #44 in its second week, and has been selling so poorly
that Virgin Records reportedly has halted CD pressing for the time being.
Lenny has lasted this long on borrowed sounds, and it is time that he begin
to invent his own. He is a multi-instrumentalist with a platinum
voice, who has shown that he has the ability on occasion in inspired moments
to write original material that arguably could have only come out of his
musical soul as a songwriter. It seems the place he was writing from
on the albums “Let Love Rule” and “Mama Said” was more honest or heartfelt
based on the love and then heartache he was going through in his own life-
if nothing else, he was certainly more inspired, consistent and appealing.
In that way, as a fan, I love Lenny for who he was, not who he has become.
Within the context of this article, my main point is that Rock N’ Roll
is most enjoyable when its not forced, and therein, Lenny needs to relax,
let his hair down, and start not caring again about being relevant as he
writes and records, whereafter he will almost surely be re-embraced by
the core fans he has lost.
.
.
Shameless Plug: In Stores Now:
What’s Love? A Tribute to Tina Turner, the latest release from Versailles
Records!!! Visit www.versaillesrecords.com
to learn more, or head to your local record store or online retailer to
pick up a copy!!!
Posted by Big Daddy:
Lenny's lack of originality can be referenced by the fact that he rips off (or as Jake puts it "borrows") every single guitar riff that he's ever had a hit with. To me, constantly stealing Led Zeppelin and Jimi Hendrix riffs proves that Lenny has never had nor ever will have any talent whatsoever. Add to that his super cheese-ball wanna-be rock-star image, and his holier-than-thou attitude (he claims that some famous people got lucky as they are not true entertainers), and you've got the formula for the greatest industry-standard cookie-cutter rock-star since Leif Garrett.
Posted by BUTCH:
lenny kravitz??? you must be kidding. personally, I think lenny has never been "relevent" or "iconoclatic" or even good. he is, was, and always will be a musical whore. his downfall is not tragic nor is it even worth noting. his obituary will be in the back pages and won't even have a piture next to it. I'll p!ss on his grave. JAke, don't you have anything better to write about?
Posted by whatever:
Whether or not he can play soft or hard music is not in question. The music he makes and most of all the image he pushes sucks rather badly. But he sure can turn up his amp and crank a crappy riff. Whoohoo!
Posted by I don't care if you like his music or not...:
All I want to say is that anyone who didn't see Lenny as a guy that can do rock music and much, much softer music at the same time is a moron, because its what he has always done.
Posted by whatever:
Why does radio always seem to support Lenny's crap? I honestly just don't get it.
Posted by Wageslave:
Far better than any Hobo or Deadsun piece could ever be...articulate and well written, this dude is totally right..he hits on everything gone wrong with Lenny. I find he is definitly jumping on some bandwagons though...the lead single is a Strokes rip-off if you ask me..and the new look is some type of Andre 3000 love-child thing....what a fool...
Posted by Nun's N' Moses:
Keep in mind that artists are slaves to thier record company. Neil Young was sued by his record company because he released an album that didn't sound enough like himself. Figure that one out. This may be part of Lenny's predicament.
Posted by Nuns N' Moses:
Lenny can't just start writing original music, because its something he has never done. He is stuck in this self built niche as a classic rock icon that wasn't. If he were to write good music, he would be throwing away the only formula he knows, which is 1. listen to old mediocre records. 2. write something that sounds like it. He knows nothing else! To tell you the truth, he lost me way back with "it ain't over." That totally convinced me that he was NOT a rock star. It was kindof like when Living Color released "Glamour Boys." Ehhhgg.
Posted by apparatus:
This Is The Altar, The One That You Let Me Die In...On Your Knees, How You Wept ...
Posted by Eagles:
Off the new album I've only heard the single "Where are we running", it sounds like something KISS would've come out with in the 70's. That's not actually a bad thing, the songs catchy and does rock somewhat, but it's definitely not very original. Still though I don't necessarily believe everything needs to be truly innovative and original to entertain. To quote a great band, "I don't care for fancy music if your shoes can't shuffle around". Well actually I do, but sometimes it's nice to just kick back and listen to something with a good riff, rhythm and energy to it, not everything can be Beethoven nor should it be.
Posted by Dragonboots03:
well hell I still like him. That's all I care about. His new CD is great except for the Jay-Z track.
Posted by Chuck DiMaria:
I remember Lenny when he was Romeo Blue. Nice piece, Jake.
Posted by rightocensor:
Totally true.. it's all about bringing out the true artist inside not what they think will be catchy and played over and over on mainstream radio....