Don’t question
the cult doctrine. This is another defining aspect of cults,
blind obedience to the cult doctrine. Few TRL loyalists question
the musical integrity of the groups shown on the show. If TRL convinced
its viewers that Michael Bolton is cool, you’d be surprised at how many
TRL viewers would buy up Bolton’s CD’s. The heresy comes when you question
a so-called “cool” group that appears on TRL. TRLies have a ready-made
attack to those who question their favorite TRL groups or performers. If
you don’t like say N Sync, a TRLie will tell you that you are just jealous!
Remember it has nothing to do with the music, it’s about what’s cool and
what’s not. So if you simply don’t find Destiny’s Child’s music appealing,
to a TRLie you are just jealous. But what happens to a group when
they fall out of favor with TRL? That’s simple, they are no longer cool
and you shouldn’t listen to them any longer if you want to remain cool.
There is a difference
between a benign and a destructive cult. Which camp does TRL fall into?
That really depends on your perspective. If you are music purist then you
see TRL as destructive to music because of its sure influence over the
music markets. Record companies aren’t stupid; they will follow whatever
trends will bring in the most money and because of this quality suffers.
Where goes TRL so goes the industry. Even a talentless hack like Missy
Eliot can sell CD’s when her videos appear on TRL. Then you have TRL exposing
young people to the verbal venom of Eminem. Is TRL dangerous in its influence
over the music industry? Does the music industry as a whole become so narrowly
defined that rock groups can’t get record deals? Will TRL kill rock?
That’s a little extreme but there is some truth to those statements. If
a band like Queen came out today, chances are they wouldn’t be able to
get a record deal or exposure because they don't fit the mold of TRL. So
the world would be robbed of their music. Sure there is plenty of rock
still out there, but fewer and fewer record labels are taking chances on
innovative artists; those who propel music to a new dimension and keep
it from becoming stale. Judging by the current state of music and TRL,
would Nirvana even have a chance at a major label deal and the exposure
that can come from it?
On the other hand,
some people see TRL as being no different than Top 40 radio. They simply
play what they feel will be popular and by that action make it popular.
Next week, next month or next year a new artist will come along and change
the direction of popular music and TRL will change with it. While that
is plausible, the sad fact remains that since TRL has such a stranglehold
over the industry and caters to only certain forms of music. How is an
innovative artist going to change the industry if no one has a chance to
hear them?
So there you have
it. This rant many have been a little out in left field but I feel it does
ask some important questions that should be of concern to music fans. Like
it or not, TRL’s impact is felt throughout the music industry. You can
choose to ignore it but when your favorite rock band gets dumped by their
label and can’t find another record company willing to take a chance on
them because they don’t fit the TRL mold; the TRL influence will hit home.
Then again, I could be making a mountain out of a molehill. But discussing
this possibility can’t hurt and that’s what these rantatorials are all
about. So now I leave this topic with you, the reader to draw your own
conclusion and to discuss it with other fans.
Fan Speak Here is your chance
to agree or disagree, call me names or praise me for my insight. Everyone
has an opinion. You just read mine, now lets hear yours!
Fan
Speak:
Posted by Jason: This, along with the whole clear channel
mess is what i believe led to Napster and Kazaa. still what is interesting
about that is that most people still mainly download what they hear on
the radio. it is really hard to find music by a small time band if no one
has heard them on the radio or by some other method of major promotion.
at least this this shows that people do not want to pay for the stuff that
is shoved doen there throats. i wouldnt be suprised if Pop Music is Better
isn't Carson Daily in the flesh. though to his defense i do not feel that
he really enjoys the music he promotes. weather he gets off on all the
worship he gets is another story.i can honsetly tell that i have seen him
on that show and he just has this expression on his face like "I hate this
but im gonna make a huge paycheck from this so i will just shut up and
promote it"
Posted by
cheesewhiz: lol i wouldn't be surprised if that were
true, herman
Posted by
herman: didn't some MTV exec at one time when
asked if MTV influenced kids respond "we don't influence them we own them."
? I heard that quote the other day and was wondering if it was a load of
crap or not
Posted by
i am law: whats the point of watching the same boring
videos and the same pimply faced girls 5 days a week. thats torture.