antiMusic.comNewsReviewsRockNews.infoRSS Feeds
LaTEsT NEwS
Guns N' Roses CD Gets Firm Release Date- Bon Jovi Facing $400 Billion Dollar Lawsuit- Who's Opening For AC/DC? Here Is The Answer- Van Hagar Supergroup Member Speaks- more

SPONSoR
.
LATEsT ViEWS

MorleyView: My Ruin

Magica

Tina Turner Live

Rise Against

Iced Earth

The Faint

Red I Flight

Bourgeois Gypsies

Motorhead

Hydrogyn

A Year After Radiohead's Gamble, Where Do We Go Now?

Quick Flicks: Delbert McClinton, Cat Stevens, John Martyn, Bill Monroe and Waking The Witch

Matt Mays & El Torpedo

The Hold Steady

MorleyView: Carmine Appice

Butch Walker: The Phoenix

Bum Kon Interview

Blag'ard

Neil Diamond

Poison Written

James

Yell County

Metallica Tag Team Pt II

Road Trip: Thrills & Chills: Amazing Greenland

Metallica - Death Magnetic: Tag Team Review Pt I

Marc Broussard Keeps Fans Coming Back


CLIcK THiS

The Screen Door

Lloyd Zeffler blog

Gary Gonzo

Lonn Friend

Talking Metal

Who's Been Caught Stealin? Find out at thecopycat.biz

94WYSP Philly

107thebone.fm

X92.5 FM Maui

Rock 106.3

antiMusic Myspace

ROcK N' TICKeTS

Search for Tickets

Or Browse

GoT MERcH?

Click Here to Buy T-Shirts!
Click Here to Buy T-Shirts!


Search For Posters & T-shirts!

Buy 2 CDs Get One Free!


.


 
Now That's What I Call Marketing!
by antiGUY

Consumers used to have to wait about five years before pop-hits started appearing on compilations. It’s the whole nostalgia thing, package a bunch of songs from any given year and people will buy them up to relive some long past memories. Now it appears that consumers no longer have to wait, they can get these pop hit collections immediately and relive terrible radio hits of the present! 

It makes sense, if the songs are hot right now then the CD’s are bound to sell a lot more if you hit the public while these artists are hot, instead of waiting a few years when they are long forgotten.  But wouldn’t fans opt to buy these compilation CD’s instead of the artists full-length releases if they could get the hit songs without all the filler? That was how the old thinking went, but things have changed. 

The biggest change is marketing savvy. Record companies understand that most pop artists today have a very limited shelf life, so they opt to cash in on them as much as possible while they are hot. Most of these “artists” are so devoid of substance, the record companies seem to understand that once the hype wears off people will more than likely forget all about them and move on to the next batch of pre-processed, plastic, focused grouped artists engineered to appeal to the lowest common denominator. 

In a way today’s pop music parallels the television and film industry. Pop music is the equivalent to “Dude, Where’s my Car?” and “Friends”. In other words, mindless, shallow entertainment targeted at a young audience that doesn’t know the difference between quality and fluff. Have you ever noticed that blockbuster movies usually have simplistic plots with lots of special effects? Or hit sitcoms (I call them shitcoms) humor is the equivalent of fart jokes? You can’t confound the masses with substance or intelligence if you expect to be successful, can you? The same goes for most pop music. It’s engineered to appeal to the lowest common denominator. It’s mostly catchy hooks with insipid lyrics set to computer programmed background music. The groups are interchangeable as are their songs, which are usually written by the same handful of songwriters. Just look up the name Max Martin at ASCAP’s website and you’ll find he has written hit songs for Britney Spears, N Sync, The Backstreet Boys, Celine Dion and Five just to name a few. He is even credited with co-writing Bon Jovi’s “It’s my Life”. Then there is Michael Carlsson who’s writing credits almost mirror Max Martin’s. So it’s no wonder pop music all sounds the same today, it’s all written by the same small group of people! 

Ok, I’ve heard the pop defenders say, “If you don’t like it, don’t listen to it! Stop bashing it because you don’t like it.”  That’s fine and dandy but the problem is that serious music fans miss out on quality artists because the record companies keep signing these prefab pop singers, thus leaving little room on their rosters for real musicians. Now Pop might be what you call music, but to the discerning ear it’s nothing more then extended commercial jingles engineered to sell a product, CD’s. Granted it does take at least a little vocal talent to record these songs. The funny thing is, if you listen to say a song by Britney or The Backstreet Boys the vocals are clearly processed through more computers than the Pentagon’s war games! A natural voice does not sound like that. The sad thing about Britney is she does have a great singing voice but you can't hear it under all of these effects and the Whitney wanna-be singing style. Sure vocal effects are used in the studio all the time by singers from almost every genre of music. However, most use these techniques to help give the vocals a fuller sound, not to replace the natural vocals all together. So these singers who are manufactured in the studio and taught to dance by high priced choreographers are cashing in while hard working musicians slave away by playing clubs, paying their dues and having enough talent to write their own music and not having to resort to using studio effects to cover up their musical short comings. As you read this, the chances are good that there is a band playing somewhere in the world who could possibly be the next revolutionary band like the Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath, Guns 'N' Roses or Nirvana. Unfortunately, they may never get the chance to have their music heard by more then a few people because the record industry is too busy filling their rosters with Pop groups. Don’t be fooled the record industry no longer has anything to do with art or music, it’s all about marketing. And that my friends is a sad state of affairs. In the end, we all miss out on true talent because the record companies are so short sided that the Spice Girls and the Backstreet Boys are what they think of when they say, “Now! That’s What I call Music!”. When in reality they should be saying “Now! That’s What I Call Marketing!” 

FAN SPEAK: Agree or Disagree? Where do you stand? Is it music or marketing?


They call you 
Your Rant or Rave:

Fan Speak:

Posted by slick:
BK is a fag!...
LED ZEPPELIN SUCKED?
what kinda loser are you anyway?
do you have ass'oles for ears?


Posted by Skew:
I agree with what has been said. Personally, the musicians that have affected me the most would be the Beatles, Nirvana, the Smashing Pumpkins and such. The pop revolution has, however, corrupted the music industry. Today exists a culture where a person is not judged by what they are, but rather by what they have. And the fact that musicians such as Britney Spears, and the Backstreet Boys have strived at providing a specific image towards society proves this point. Talent is most definitely not what has made them last so long in the music industry. Focusing towards all aspects of the pop culture, we can recognize the definite fixation on appearance. Yet, does the majority of their fans focus on their “talent” or is it their beauty? It is rare for me to listen to the radio without hearing the repetitive themes of drugs, sex, and money. The essence of music has shifted to materialistic commercialism. The music that should dominate the airwaves should be that of which makes you think, makes you feel, and makes you inspire. And the musicians who show their talents through their music, and through their passion should be recognized, rather than the money-grasping nonsensical pop revolutionists that succeed only in ways of image. There are musicians out in this world who can, in fact, change and inspire people. Yet in order for these talented people to be discovered, change has to be made within the music industry, so that people can truly be affected positively.


Posted by Octavius Frothingham:
i agree with everything you said 100%. i've had a lot of the same views for a long time and i plan to give a persuasive speech on the topic to my public speaking class.


Posted by Shan:
BTW, sorry for all the errors in writing in my comments, i am trying to type to fast. hehe. byee


Posted by shan:
i disagreed when u said that Britney Spears had a voice. dude, y in the hell would u say that? she has no vocal talent at all. none. some fat lady shreeking would sound better. and no, this so called "ranting and raving" that 'inspirator' calls it is nit jealousy. maybe some ppl have jealousy but personally, i don't. yea, i would love to be in the music buz, but the differencd between mee and half of the pop groups out there is that i can actually sing and i kno how to play instruments. maybe if half of them would realize that they don't have voices and all that is getting them anywhere is their sexuality that stupid nasty ppl play off of, thye owuld go away and make room for some real artists. now, i don't mind pop music because some of it is actually good, it is just when u get ppl like Mandy Moore and Britney Spears who have no vocal talent and are the most annoying ppl on earth up there, it gets on my nerves. well, that is all the tym i have to write. feel free to call mee a b*tch or whatever you want for mee being a britney hater but i agree w/ what Avril L. said and i belive that that girl has some true talent!!


Posted by Diane:
There's pop music, and then there's radio jingles designed to sell soft-core pornography. Has anyone else noticed how all the manufactured pop acts' music videos closely resemble zit commercials? Happy perfect pretty people dancing around without a care in the world. In Technicolor. Buy this product and be perfect and happy like me! Get clear skin! Invest in cosmetic surgery, and develop an eating disorder! And this is aside from the images of underage sexuality. Insidious.


Posted by whaaaaat??!:
oh mercury, when will you learn? pop music doesn't rule, it numbs the minds, it keeps us like the good little brain-washed sheep that corporations need and depend on. it takes energy and resources away from real talent. and most importantly--it sucks the devil's penis. and as for you INSIRATOR--never, EVER!! would i trade places with the britney spears and the n'syncs of the world. it's not about fame or money or jealousy. it's about the crap that's thrown in our face every day. it's about time that pop music was deflated a little. and as a matter of fact, i DO go out and do it myself. i play a REAL instrument ALL BY MYSELF!! without the help of an entourage. so quit defending garbage, and put your wallet away.


Posted by inspirator:
What everyone needs to do is get over this whole thing. What I can really say this all comes back to is jealousy. I bet anyone of you would trade spaces with Britney Spears, or N'Sync in a split second-just for the fame and fortune. All of them are sex symbols. Who wouln't want to be them? And if you are so against that proposition then I suggest this: GO OUT AND DO IT YOURSELF!! Why don't you become the next "revolutionary band"? Get out there and show them what music is really about. If you think you don't have enough talent( which you do) then get out there and help promote the REAL musicians. It does no good arguing over a computer about what you or he or she or they think. Get out there and do it.


Posted by Mr. huh?:
Music is more than just about entertainment. It's about art. Also, music is a direct extension of culture. The music of the Beatles and Bob Dylan of the sixties helped to create change for the better in society. A good society is one with a fond appreciation for the arts and sciences. One thing that we need to do is get our government to implement art and music programs as core curriculum in our nation's schools. If they can be taught a fond appreciation of music, then they won't be suckered. Also, we need our government to do something about the payola in the radio industry and the homogenization of it all. Also, BK is an idiot. "Stairway to Heaven" or "Tangerine" or others could blow stupid "Oops I Did It AGain" away.


Posted by Mercury:
pop music rules!


Posted by Rock 'n' Rule:
My first real experience with this phenomenon was in the early 90's when I heard a VJ announce a "brand-new, never before heard hit song!" that she was about to play... my first reaction was 'what the fvck??! how can it be a hit if no one's ever heard it before???'. Unfortunately, most young music fans aren't savvy enough to make that little leap of logic and fail to deduce that when they're told that a brand new song is what all their friends are listening to that it's impossible because all their friends are hearing it for the first time at the exact same time they are. They just buy into the hype along with all the other gullible teens too terrified to risk failing to be cool and current to actually think about the bullsh!t that's being forced down they're throat. By the time they're a bit older and have more brains and more willpower to figure out they were being played for suckers, there's yet another crop of new and innocent music fans for the marketers to brainwash. Bully for capitalism.


Posted by slash:
i have a friend who's uncle knows a man that writes for people like bsb(not them,but people like them)and he was told that the people who wrote these songs know they are corny but they know they will sell.


Posted by threerandot:
I would have to agree. It is my experience that the past 10 years or so have been really disappointing in terms of what is coming out of the major labels. I am thoroughly horrified by the concept of "Pop Stars" myelf. You know the show where a whole bunch of teenagers are willing to degrade themselves on national TV just for a few minutes of fame and possibly get picked up for a recording contract. That is totally opposite of the way music really needs to be introduced to a person. These kids are not real singers to start with.... OK a few of them may be... but the ones who will get picked in the end will be the ones with the best camera looks and with a personality that can stand the stress of being in the spotlight. Look at older rock groups like the Rolling Stones and so on. They have to continue performing long after their youth is gone because a) They want to keep living their expensive lifestyle b)If they did retire what would they do then? My point... when you become a rock star you basically sign your soul to the devil. You sign your life away... that is if you become popular. It's probably better not to become a Rock Star today though because you will probably have a short career. Why not learn to play Jazz or Classical? These careers can last a lifetime. Don't get me wrong, I grew up on Rock 'n' Roll too, but the Pop Industry is dog eat dog.


Posted by timasaurus:
you guys are forgetting what music is about. Entertainment. Let people listen to what ever they want to listen to- it doesn't matter. Pop is short for popular and it's popular for a reason- because most people want to hear it. I totally agree that real musicians are left out in the cold, but most of the more alternate/underground acts that really care about the music would rather avoid the mainstream. There are channels to hear all kinds of music and I think everything should be left how it is.


Posted by BK,the Teen Hearthrob:
Oh no,I've upset that me,he,she,it jerk-off again.I must have insulted one of those boy bands he likes.Oh,well.He or she(whoever you are,but I'm going with she,because I'm doubting you have any testicles),you can like your Yanni or Kathie Lee Gifford or whatever crap you listen to,and I'll take my Weezer and Dave Matthews Band and be content with my life.And,oh by the way,your girlfriend didn't think I was such a stupid fag.


Posted by Tylr:
Yes, change is definitely due, and will come. But that means that all you "serious" music fans are going to have to do your part. By that, I mean going out and actively seeking and supporting the real musicians in this country. Help these bands achieve the recognition that they deserve by promoting them and staying positive. Keep your eyes and ears on the gigantic indie scene..... And now, a shameless plug for my band, Government Grown, playing trance-rock-reggae. Go to www.governmentgrown.com. You will like it.


Posted by me:
BK you are a stupid fag


Posted by BK,the Teen Hearthrob:
I can honestly say this was the dumbest post I have ever had the displeasure of reading.Granted,I dislike this generic boy bands as much as the next person,but these revolutionary bands you spoke of,come on.With the exception of Nirvana and a couple of Black Sabbath songs,they all sucked.We already have the new Beatles with all this boy band crap.Led Zeppelin and Guns N Roses sucked.If there is "revolutionary bands" out there like those three,I'd rather watch Britney Spears videos.At least she has a nice rack.


Posted by Pop Hater:
amen to that...


Posted by Filthy Lucre:
Since the demise of Headbangers Ball Mtv has for the most part sucked. However, if any one has the opprotunity to catch Mtv-X watch you won't be able to stop.


Posted by rocky racoon:
Ive heard a couple of the songs and they sounded allright, not sure if ill get around to listening to the album.


Posted by Trendkill138:
Hey Rocky, have you heard 30 Odd Foot Of Grunts?


Posted by rocky racoon:
I was looking at the top 20 albums in the American charts and i think i know why you guys are so worried. Over here in Australia weve still got alot of good rock and pop music and nearly all the top selling Aussie acts are genuine bands


Posted by liu:
so true....it explains why we all hate all that pop crap


Posted by Josh:
Has anybody ever thought about the possibility of these bands actually having staying power? scary huh, kept me up for a week thinking about...thank God for TOOL


Posted by iqbal:
0091498270456


Posted by Niage:
Mtv controls the popular music today more than anything else. Granted they don't take part in signing musicians, but you don't usually see bands blowing up and then their video is on Mtv. It's the other way around. Of course it's not Mtv's fault that so many people make crap music, but it does seem like they only choose to play new music that mimics whatever is at the top of the bilboard charts at the time. In my opinion popular music right now is at an all time low. There have always been untalented bands and artists, but today almost all of the popular music acts are untalented. Hardly any of this music has relevence and staying power. And will all have disappeared in 3-5 years, but what will come after that. Most likely more garbage. Where has all the true talent gone?


Posted by Niage:
Mtv controls the popular music today more than anything else. Granted they don't take part in signing musicians, but you don't usually see bands blowing up and then their video is on Mtv. It's the other way around. Of course it's not Mtv's fault that so many people make crap music, but it does seem like they only choose to play new music that mimics whatever is at the top of the bilboard charts at the time. In my opinion popular music right now is at an all time low. There have always been untalented bands and artists, but today almost all of the popular music acts are untalented. Hardly any of this music has relevence and staying power. And will all have disappeared in 3-5 years, but what will come after that. Most likely more garbage. Where has all the true talent gone?


Posted by ZWOOF:
Don't worry folks .. they'll keep sellin' .. just keep buyin'


Posted by ZWOOF:
Don't worry folks .. they'll keep sellin' .. just keep buyin'


Posted by rocky racoon:
youve got to admit the spice girls do have alot going for them. There damm sexy for one thing and theve got some catchy songs that i often find myself singing and dancing along to. Maybe the reason that people are buying records from these marketed pop groups is because of the lack of good pop albums around these days.


Posted by Mercury:
What's this....a well thought out, articulate and intelligent post?! HERE?! On Anti-music?! Wonders never cease!


Posted by Planet Zion:
I agree with this thought provoking essay. There are many hard working musicians today who find it difficult to channel their efforts. The reason being, they feel discouraged by the uninspiring music the media consistantly seems to promote. On a positive note, however, I see many music fans today who have lost respect in the music business and the bubble gum acts that it represents. With fewer consumers, there will inevitably be fewer sales. Never in history has there been a time when the music of past decades and trends has become as popular as it is today. I would like to think that Americans have more intelligence and taste than to take seriously the music of Aguilera, Lopez, or Rick Martin. With the quality of mainstreem music at such a low, I feel that change is surely do to come.


Posted by Louis J.M:
Couldn't have written it any better. "Common sense is not so common".


Posted by question mark:
i agree with the antiguy completely on this one.


Posted by george:
today's rock scene really sucks, we are putting up with pop punk crap(blink 182, sum41), grunge rip offs (3 doors down, fuel, creed, staind), rap metal crap (limp, linkin park) and pussy rock bands (life house, train, american hi fi).


Posted by Mercury:
that's BESTOWED.....not betowed....cause I don't wanna be towed.....too expensive.


Posted by Mercury:
Man, I thought Generation Swine was their BEST album!! They got Vince back and then they got serious and made one HELL of an album. Even the lyrics on that album were almost good. Nikki Sixx is one of the very worst lyrisists ever betowed upon man, but he did a decent job an that album.


Posted by METAL KILLS:
The reason for which no one is doing albums that nobody expected them to do anymore is because of the way the corrupt record industry works. Bands are simply afraid to do that after seeing what happened when Motley Crue went out on a limb with Genreation Swine. GS is not one of my favorite albums, but it's certainly one of the most creative and different albums ever made. Unfortunately few people even know about it because when the record company heard something so different, they refused to promote it. MTV refused to play it too, so it bombed.


Posted by Josh:
Don't compare anything out today to the Beatles. Simple reason for that to, you can't compair greatness to crap.


Posted by rocky racoon:
crap heavily marketed bands have always toped the charts but, its nothing new


Posted by zKick:
This isn't limited to pop music, you know. Almost all new music is like this. It's all about what sells. Music used to be real.


Posted by rocky racoon:
Max describes pop as "Cheezy song structure with the teen love song lyrics...that kind of pop" That sounds like my fav album of all time A Hard Days Night by the The Beatles. Surely where not all too tough for cheezy love songs.


Posted by Stinky:
A famous comedian once said it's not called "show art" it's called "show BUSINESS".


Posted by Fruit:
Uh...the article was too long fer my eyes to bear so i skipped it and read the reviews...my friend's aunt dated bon jovi. dont ask...aerosmith is ugly. ricky martin is annoying. pop is a disgrace. there you have it...my review


Posted by the max:
When I talk about "pop" I don't really mean it as short for "popular" which The Admiral seems to be talking about. Yes, even metal can be that pop(ular) What I'm talking about is Pop in the musical genre sense. Cheezy song structure with the teen love song lyrics...that kind of pop (I shouldn't need to give examples). Once you put pop elements into metal...it is no longer metal. Bon Jovi is so far from metal it's not even worth going into why...it should be evident enough. If anything Bon Jovi would be Pop-rock.


Posted by Mercury:
It's true, pop music is so watered down with over-production and synthesis that everybody is starting to sound very similar...and to have the same people writing all the top hits.....well, that helps too. But there's always somebody (or a group of somebodys) from each generation of music that ends up writing a good portion of the hits for a while. Bob Ezrin was the man in the 70's for and with Alice Cooper and Kiss and Pink Floyd. Nile Rodgers in the late 70's and early to mid 80's with Chic, Sister Sledge, Diana Ross, Power Station and with David Bowie (on Let's Dance) just to name a few. But the big difference there is that Ezrin and Rodgers were legitimately GREAT song writers (I assume they still are, but now those artists are no longer hip, so we don't hear too much from them anymore). What's wrong with challenging the masses with truely different, thought-provoking songs instead of what we're getting from today's artists?! There is nobody out there right now with the integrity and balls to go out there the way David Bowie did (and still does to a degree)and compose a record of songs that NOBODY expected to here from them. The only way these new bands intend on challenging any of us is maybe an invite out to the parking lot after the show to fight. Or this new attitude these days, it seems, to be more evil than the last evil band or "performer". It's like "huh, you thought Marilyn Manson was evil, well just check out how fvcked up and annoying I can be!" I can't wait for the next wave of music that has actual melodies and song writing talent. I mean, I like Weezers song "Hash Pipe", as I ststed previously on another topic, but I know this isn't a well written song. He can't sing and he plays about 3 chords through out the whole song....and this is practically the BEST new radio stations have to offer! It's crying shame, it really is.


Posted by METAL KILLS:
Right on Admiral. That's pretty much the way I see it too.


Posted by The Admiral:
Well, marketing for musical product is not just limited to "pop" music. There is plenty of really bad rock music today that is all over the airways and on MTV. It is just as overproduced and processed as the Britneys of the world, but instead of giving off a happy, fun, dnaceable attitude, it appeals to its fanbase (mostly white males from suburban middle-class families) as being rebellious or some crap like that. Record companies know how to market anything ("alternative" is a state of mind, it doesn't have to be only loud and angry) and are killing the art and fun of music. Also, the word "pop" itself has been ruined. It is not just inoffensive, forgettable dance music. Anything with melodies and song structure can be pop. So,most rock music is pop, including metal.


Posted by Eagles:
Guns N Roses wasn't at all revolutionary, although they are my second favorite band on your list.


Posted by METAL KILLS:
Well, the millions of people who bought the albums do think that metal and pop mix just great. I'll be the first to say that Bon Jovi ain't no Iron Maiden, but Bon Jovi sure beats the hell out of N'Sync or Limp Bizkit. I'd rather see Maiden played everywhere too, but unfortunately it ain't gonna happen. At least popier metal like Bon Jovi, Aerosmith, and Guns N' Roses getting air play is better than no metal getting air play.


Posted by the max:
Ummmm...pop metal? I really don't think there is such a thing. Yeah Yeah Yeah...I know that all that hair band era crap was considered "pop metal" to some. If you really think about it though, pop and metal can never truly be fused...too opposite genres. The subject matter of both is just too far removed from each other. Sappy, teen love song lyrics and vocals don't go well with metal.


Posted by METAL KILLS:
Yeah, I agree. Crush wasn't that good, but there were some really cool songs on it. Like "The Next 100 Years," it starts out lame, but it ends with one of the coolest guitar solos that I've ever heard. It's really out there! But then again for all the creative thing they have, there's some sh!t like Thank You For Loving Me, which sounds like something that Celine Dion would have done. I liked It's My Life and One Wild Night thoug. It's nice to see some pop metal back on the mainstream media nowadays.


Posted by pyromania:
I meant Sound Loaded instead of Loaded


Posted by pyromania:
By the way, I just read the post that says "Did you ever notice how Bon Jovi's "One Wild Night" is really Ricky Martin's "She Bangs"?" Whoever said that, it's a good thing you didn't write your name, because you need to get a clew. The song One Wild Night was originally on the Crush album which came out a while before Ricky Martin's Loaded - of which She Bangs was the first single.


Posted by pyromania:
Bon Jovi rocks. I think that Crush was a cool album. It had a lot of different things. Some were bad and some were good, but overall it was an interesting album - definitely worth listening to.


Posted by ^:
bon jovi sucks


Posted by samhain:
Fart jokes are cool!


Posted by rocket:
Aerosmith's Just Push Play is one of the best albums of the year.


Posted by the max:
It's called career suicide.


Posted by greg:
what the hell is aerosmith doing in that cd


Posted by iamsocool:
if you dont like the pop or watered down metal you hear today, get off your ass and listen to something else. youre not the only one in your town that thinks this way, try listening to local bands.


Posted by nigel:
As always rocky racoon shows his ass. Dude you are a fricken moron.


Posted by rocky racoon:
Um i think your going a bit overboard there, Firstly there are alot of good radio friendly pop tunes out there and to class all pop acts as being crap is wrong and 2nd marketed pop/rock has been around forever


Posted by METAL KILLS:
About One Wild Night and She Bangs, that's true, but that's because while Desmond Child CO-writes songs WITH the members of Bon Jovi, he, by himself, writes songs FOR Ricky Martin. That's also probably one of the reasons why She Bangs wasn't successful. Many people had heard the original version of One Wild Night on Crush and by the time She Bangs came out, it was already old - and lame cos Bon Jovi can play their instruments a lot better and with a lot more chemistry than the paid studio musicians who play on Ricky Martin's albums.


Posted by Machiavelli:
The man´s got a point. Music is supposed to be about more than just making money or having something to dance to when inebriated. But the music industry today does not encourage creativity. Swedish writers to write and arrange, and bare-chested models to "perform" the songs. And the sad thing is that they only need one band every 5-10 years to set the trend. Then they can just spin off them.


Posted by adaj7:
I don't know about everyone else, but my biggest problem with this pop crap is that it's like every other fad, from Pokemon to Survivor, no matter where you go, you can't escape it! It's everywhere! From tv ads to articles right here on Antimusic, wheather they are promoting it or slamming it (like this article), you still just cannot get away from it. I must say that I disagree with the statment that there are no good bands getting signed, just going to the reviews section here at Antimusic there are a TON of kick ass bands, and I just dont't have time to check them all out, even if I'd like to, so although there arn't many good bands in the mainstream, it doesn't mean that they arn't getting signed.


Posted by jeff:
good points, but there is one problem. it's always going to be like this. it really dosent matter what type of music is "mainstreem", ther's always going to be "fake" bands around. just look at all this new metal craze. can anyone truly say that linkin park & crazy town are both talented and original?? no. what people tend to forget is that record companies run a business; their not just going to turn their backs on music that they know will make them money. but most of these companies also know a talented band when they hear one, thats why bands like tool, mudvayne and ratm all got their break. REALLY talented unsinged-bands don't stay unsinged for long.


Posted by GREENMUSE:
did anyone happen to see that show on vh1 about bands and endorsments,and what not.one persons theory was soon music wont be sold,it will be given away with a product ie :mcdonaldland cookies,hamburgers.and whats wrong with fart jokes,every one likes fart jokes.take this classic canadian offering,terrance:"phillip,would you like a monkey claw?"*loud fart sound*,ow it feels like a thousand monkeys are ripping out my colon!!.phillip:"the monkey claw is very smelly"


Posted by :
Did you ever notice how Bon Jovi's "One Wild Night" is really Ricky Martin's "She Bangs"?


Posted by METAL KILLS:
Max Martin didn't co-write It's My Life. That mofo gets writing credits ONLY because he was in the studio while Bon Jovi were writing the song - to tell them how much they've inspired him. Even IF he were to write a part of the song (which he did NOT), it still wouldn't make a difference considering that Mr. Martin's career is based on stealing from Def Leppard (Larger Than Life was like a puny version of Pour Some Sugar on Me with different lyrics), Bon Jovi, and other pop metal bands. Bon Jovi should quit screwing around with no-talent-wannabes and really stick to co-writing with Desmond Child who is actually talented.


Posted by Samhain:
All I got to say about the above articule is "Preach on Brutha"!


Posted by this is crap:
Spears needs more than implants to survive in this world, hopefully she'll get upset about her hair and leave the music bussniess


end


SEARcH
SPONSoR
.
DaY IN RoCK REPORtS

10/10: Guns N' Roses CD Gets Firm Release Date- Bon Jovi Facing $400 Billion Dollar Lawsuit- Who's Opening For AC/DC? Here Is The Answer- Van Hagar Supergroup Member Speaks and more

10/09: Did Zeppelin Find A New Singer? And Is It Someone We Already Know?- Linkin Park Injury Kills Tour Plans- My Morning Jacket Star Takes A Fall During Show and more

10/08: Former Guns N' Roses Members Form Guns of Destruction- Travis Barker Thankful To Be Alive- Dimebag Bio Coming- Weezer Trouble, Britney Lacks Appeal and more

10/07: Did Oasis Rip Off Cliff Richard Song?- Weezer Set World Records, Yes Records As In More Than One- Green Day Enlist Nirvana Producer for New CD?- and more

 Subscribe

VIeWS & SERiES

• Tag Team: Metallica - Death Magnetic Pt II - Pt I

• antiTainment: The Pineapple Express - The X-Files: I Want To Believe

• Backtrack: The Hold Steady Dave Matthews Band: In Memory of LeRoi Moore

• HHH: Poison Written - Mountain Mirrors

MorleyViews: My Ruin - Carmine Appice - Soda X

• Passport: Vol 2 - Vol 1

Root 66: Bourgeois Gypsies - Buffalo Killers

• Live: Bruce Springsteen - Testament, Motorhead, Heaven & Hell and Judas Priest - Mayhem Fest - Three Doors Down, Staind, Hinder - George Michael

The Biz: AC/DC's Latest Dirty Deeds Not Dirt Cheap - Kid Rock: More Bang For Fewer Bucks - Madonna Like A Scalper

Road Trip: Amazing Greenland - Bonaire Jazz Festival

Rob's Photo Blog: Tom Petty Photos - Maroon 5 - The Cure

The Screen Door: Tina Turner Live - Butch Walker - John Mellencamp

Interviews: Bum Kon - Opeth - The Dillinger Escape Plan

Quick Flicks: Delbert McClinton, Cat Stevens, John Martyn, Bill Monroe and Waking The Witch - Joe Strummer, The Clash, Attitude For Destruction, The Deadboys

Five Star: James - Marc Broussard - Portishead

Hot in the City: Opiate For The Masses, Greeley Estates, Vayden, The Maine and more

• Photos: Love and Rockets - Disturbed - Testament - Velvet Revolver - Van Halen

See the left hand menu for more reviews

TODaY'S NEwS

Bon Jovi Song Theft Suit: A Strike Out?

Guns N' Roses CD Gets Firm Release Date

Exclusive: Bon Jovi Facing $400 Billion Dollar Lawsuit

Who's Opening For AC/DC? Here Is The Answer

Van Hagar Supergroup Member Speaks

Osbournes Blacklisted

Lamb of God Banned From Metallica Gig

Headbangers Ball Turns 20

X Announce Final 08 Show Dates

Austin Powers Star Busted For Gang Rape

3 Doors Down Returning To The Road

The (International) Noise Conspiracy Taking Back Tour Dates

Opeth DVD Screening

Bad Rap

Crazy Hank Garland Film Hitting Theaters

Mates Of State Add Tour Leg

Adele Night Live

Classic Performance From Blues Legend Howlin' Wolf Gets US Release

Godhead Week: Final Day

More News


Subscribe to Day in Rock Report by Email


antiMusic.comDay in Rock.comRockNews.infoMetal is HERE!
Tell a Friend about this page - Contact Us - Privacy - antiMusic Email - Job Postings - Advertising

Copyright© 1998 - 2008 Iconoclast Entertainment Group All rights reserved.
antiMusic works on a free link policy for reprinting of our original articles, click here for details. Please click here for legal restrictions and terms of use applicable to this site.  Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use.